Interim Dean Lee Fisher participated in “The Sound of Ideas” radio show on WCPN/90.3 (Cleveland-area NPR affiliate) on April 19. Dean Fisher discussed DeRolph v. Ohio, the landmark Ohio Supreme Court case decided in 1997, which ruled that the way in which Ohio funded education was unconstitutional. The program is available for viewing here.
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
Categories
Dear Dean Fisher, I listened with great interest to the radio interview about the Ohio school finance case. In the immortal words of that great philosopher, Yogi Berra, it was “deja vu all over again.” I served as co-counsel for plaintiffs in the Massachusetts school finance litigation for some 23 years (1982 until 2005). We won the liability phase in 1993, the Massachusetts legislature passed a new statute shortly thereafter, and we returned to court to prove that the new funding formula was not sufficient. We had a 78-day trial, the specially-appointed Superior Court judge then filed a 350 page findings of fact with the highest court, Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”), all in our favor and, without any facts in dispute, the SJC denied relief. We know that the real reason was that the needed remedy would not just have resulted in new taxes, but would have required a new tax structure. Even though appointed for life (or until age 70, whichever is later), the members of the SJC knew where the funding for the courts comes from (the legislature), and they punted. Later, when the specially-appointed Superior Court judge was named to the SJC by then Governor Patrick, I was invited to the ceremony and greeted the new justice (Margot Botsford), by telling her that she was the best definition of “poetic justice” I knew. I wrote two published law review articles about the case and gave printed copies to the CM library. They are also on my website, http://www.romlawoffice.com. There simply is not the political or judicial will to find a just funding formula. You are right to say that we shouldn’t invoke Robin Hood, but neither should we allow the status quo to remain. Look to the way Hawaii and New Mexico deal with school funding for guidance (and not that they are perfect either!) Alan